<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pittsburgh Legal Back Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com</link>
	<description>Legal topics of interest to lawyers and consumers with a Pittsburgh and Western Pennsylvania focus.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paterno&#8217;s Grand Jury Testimony Is Inadmissible at Trial. by Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4478#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4478#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaking of evidentiary issues in ongoing child abuse cases, Joe Paterno&#8217;s grand jury testimony is inadmissible in the ongoing Jerry Sandusky case because he cannot be cross-examined by defense.  [Legal Backtalk] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaking of evidentiary issues in ongoing child abuse cases, Joe Paterno&#8217;s grand jury testimony is inadmissible in the ongoing Jerry Sandusky case because he cannot be cross-examined by defense.  [Legal Backtalk] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Estate:  All is not quiet on the mortgage foreclosure front. by laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/3842#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=3842#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Hi

Since I&#039;ve listed a website that contains the word, republican, I feel a need to state that I have no political party affiliation. 
Onward. Pertaining to real estate and applicable code on the PA level, is it enough to rely on references found at the website for the PA General Assembly? 
The FDIC closed my local banking institution a few years back, thus putting my mortgage at risk. Presto chango, BoA got it. It&#039;s been transferred and exchanged between many LLCs since that time. I don&#039;t think this latest change of hands is clean either. I don&#039;t believe this LLC could establish a legitimate claim to receive payment from me.
If you please, I&#039;d simply like to be informed of the latest &#039;rules of engagement&#039; in order to defend whatever action I choose to do in dealing with this questionable LLC. 
Thank you. 
lk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;ve listed a website that contains the word, republican, I feel a need to state that I have no political party affiliation.<br />
Onward. Pertaining to real estate and applicable code on the PA level, is it enough to rely on references found at the website for the PA General Assembly?<br />
The FDIC closed my local banking institution a few years back, thus putting my mortgage at risk. Presto chango, BoA got it. It&#8217;s been transferred and exchanged between many LLCs since that time. I don&#8217;t think this latest change of hands is clean either. I don&#8217;t believe this LLC could establish a legitimate claim to receive payment from me.<br />
If you please, I&#8217;d simply like to be informed of the latest &#8216;rules of engagement&#8217; in order to defend whatever action I choose to do in dealing with this questionable LLC.<br />
Thank you.<br />
lk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enhanced Assessment Data Offered by County for a Fee. by Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4452#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4452#comment-228</guid>
		<description>[...] The Allegheny County Assessors&#8217; office is now offering &#8220;enhanced&#8221; real estate information for a pretty steep fee.  Now you&#8217;ll have to pay at least $150 to show up prepared for a client&#8217;s property tax reassessment hearing.  [Legal Backtalk] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Allegheny County Assessors&#8217; office is now offering &#8220;enhanced&#8221; real estate information for a pretty steep fee.  Now you&#8217;ll have to pay at least $150 to show up prepared for a client&#8217;s property tax reassessment hearing.  [Legal Backtalk] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Loyal Tipstaff. by Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4414#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4414#comment-223</guid>
		<description>[...] This weekend, the Post-Gazette reported that many Court of Common Pleas judges hire family members as staff &#8212; one judge even has his wife as a law clerk.  Cliff Tuttle weighs in on the phenomenon this morning.  [Legal Backtalk] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This weekend, the Post-Gazette reported that many Court of Common Pleas judges hire family members as staff &#8212; one judge even has his wife as a law clerk.  Cliff Tuttle weighs in on the phenomenon this morning.  [Legal Backtalk] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2012 Reassessment:  Hearings Begin, But Where Are the Comps? by ThirdChair</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4398#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>ThirdChair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4398#comment-222</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not perfect, but I&#039;ve been using Zillow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not perfect, but I&#8217;ve been using Zillow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Rick Santorum Running for Vice President? by Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4384#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4384#comment-221</guid>
		<description>[...] vest into the ring (sorry) to be Mitt Romney&#8217;s vice president? Cliff Tuttle thinks so.  [Pittsburgh Legal Backtalk]   Advertisement  GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vest into the ring (sorry) to be Mitt Romney&#8217;s vice president? Cliff Tuttle thinks so.  [Pittsburgh Legal Backtalk]   Advertisement  GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Message Box is Back. by cltuttle</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4358#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>cltuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4358#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the comment Section.  I&#039;m looking forward to reading your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the comment Section.  I&#8217;m looking forward to reading your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reassessment 2012: What About All Those Sheriff Sale Properties? by Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4312#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4312#comment-207</guid>
		<description>[...] value, and we all know that foreclosures are driving real estate prices down around here.  [Pittsburgh Legal Backtalk]     GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] value, and we all know that foreclosures are driving real estate prices down around here.  [Pittsburgh Legal Backtalk]     GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reassessment of the Reassessment by Fitzgerald &#8212; Too Little, Too Late? by Afternoon News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4299#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Afternoon News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4299#comment-195</guid>
		<description>[...] Tuttle predicts gamesmanship in the ongoing Allegheny County property tax reassessment.  [Pittsburgh Legal Backtalk]     GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tuttle predicts gamesmanship in the ongoing Allegheny County property tax reassessment.  [Pittsburgh Legal Backtalk]     GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;AdOpt&quot;, &quot;1&quot;); GA_googleAddAttr(&quot;Origin&quot;, &quot;other&quot;); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Christmas Reassessment by Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/archives/4275#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning News Docket &#171; Third Chair: Pittsburgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pittsburghlegalbacktalk.com/?p=4275#comment-179</guid>
		<description>[...] Tuttle weighs in on the kerfluffle re Allegheny County property tax reassessments.  [Legal Backtalk]  Like this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tuttle weighs in on the kerfluffle re Allegheny County property tax reassessments.  [Legal Backtalk]  Like this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

